U.S.-Israel Ties: Where Biden and Trump Differ in the realm of foreign affairs, few relationships command as much attention—and controversy—as the U.S.-Israel alliance. Long regarded as one of the most enduring partnerships in modern geopolitics, the bond between these two nations has seen moments of fierce solidarity and spirited debate. But under the leadership of President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump, that partnership has followed notably divergent paths.
From embassy relocations to arms sales, peace agreements to policy posturing, the differences in approach are as substantial as they are symbolic. This in-depth exploration dissects the Biden vs Trump Israel stance, unraveling how ideology, diplomacy, and political calculus have shaped one of America’s most scrutinized international relationships.
A Shared Legacy, Distinct Paths
The alliance between the United States and Israel stretches back to 1948, when President Harry Truman swiftly recognized the newly declared State of Israel. Since then, the partnership has blossomed into a strategic, military, and cultural connection that transcends political party lines in Washington.
Yet, how that relationship is expressed—and prioritized—depends greatly on who occupies the White House. The Biden vs Trump Israel stance reveals two sharply contrasting philosophies on what support for Israel should look like in practice.
Trump’s Approach: Emphatic and Unapologetically Pro-Israel
Donald Trump’s presidency marked a period of enthusiastic—and often polarizing—support for Israel. Guided by his son-in-law Jared Kushner and a deeply loyal evangelical Christian base, Trump took steps that previous presidents had either avoided or approached with far more caution.
1. The Embassy Move to Jerusalem
Perhaps the most iconic moment of Trump’s Israel policy came in December 2017, when he announced that the United States would officially recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and move the American embassy there from Tel Aviv.
This move, while fulfilling a long-standing campaign promise, sent geopolitical shockwaves through the Middle East. Celebrated in Israel and among Trump’s supporters, the decision was condemned by many allies and international bodies, who saw it as a death knell to the two-state solution.
2. The Abraham Accords
Under Trump’s leadership, the U.S. brokered the Abraham Accords—historic normalization agreements between Israel and several Arab nations, including the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Sudan, and Morocco.
These agreements marked a diplomatic triumph and were framed as a pivot away from the long-stalled Israeli-Palestinian peace process. While lauded for fostering regional cooperation, critics argued the accords sidestepped core issues of Palestinian sovereignty and rights.
3. Trump on Iran and Security
Trump’s hardline stance on Iran was music to Israeli ears. He pulled the U.S. out of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in 2018, re-imposing harsh sanctions and adopting a “maximum pressure” campaign.
Israel, which views Iran as its chief existential threat, applauded this move. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called it a “bold decision” that rectified a catastrophic deal. Trump’s posture was unequivocally pro-Israel in both rhetoric and military alignment.
Biden’s Approach: Calibrated Support, Strategic Diplomacy
In contrast to Trump’s bombast, President Biden has taken a more measured tone toward Israel—still supportive, but infused with nuance and traditional diplomacy.
1. Restoring Balance on the Palestinian Question
Biden restored hundreds of millions of dollars in aid to Palestinians that had been cut under Trump and reopened diplomatic channels with Palestinian leaders. His administration supports a two-state solution and has voiced concerns over Israeli settlement expansion, evictions in East Jerusalem, and the treatment of Palestinians in Gaza.
While Biden has not reversed the embassy move to Jerusalem, he has repeatedly emphasized the need for an equitable resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict—a marked departure from his predecessor’s unilateral alignment with Israeli interests.
2. Re-engaging with Iran
The Biden vs Trump Israel stance is perhaps most starkly illustrated by their positions on Iran. Biden’s administration has attempted to revive the JCPOA, believing that diplomacy offers the best path to preventing a nuclear-armed Iran.
Israel remains deeply skeptical of this approach. Israeli leaders have expressed frustration over Washington’s efforts to re-enter the deal, seeing it as a return to a flawed framework that could embolden Tehran.
Still, Biden has insisted that any re-entry would be contingent on Iran’s compliance and has maintained strong military cooperation with Israel to assuage concerns.
3. Crisis Management and Conflict Response
During the 2021 conflict between Israel and Hamas, Biden walked a tightrope. He reaffirmed Israel’s right to self-defense while urging de-escalation and voicing concern over civilian casualties. The administration quietly pressured Netanyahu to wind down the operation, all while publicly maintaining support.
This behind-the-scenes diplomacy contrasted with Trump’s tendency to issue bold declarations of support, regardless of the situation on the ground. Biden’s tone was pragmatic, aimed at stability over spectacle.
Evangelicals, Progressives, and the U.S. Political Divide
Public opinion in the U.S. regarding Israel is undergoing a transformation. The traditional bipartisan consensus is fracturing, with generational, ideological, and ethnic divides becoming more pronounced.
Evangelical Christians—a cornerstone of Trump’s base—remain staunchly pro-Israel and often interpret support for Israel through a religious lens. Their enthusiasm played a significant role in shaping Trump’s Middle East policy, including the embassy move and the Abraham Accords.
Conversely, progressive Democrats have grown increasingly critical of Israeli government policies, especially regarding the occupation of Palestinian territories. Lawmakers such as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Rashida Tlaib have called for greater accountability and even conditional aid.
The Biden vs Trump Israel stance reflects this tension. While Biden must balance progressive demands with strategic alliances, Trump leaned heavily into pro-Israel policies that resonated with his religious and nationalist base.
Military and Intelligence Cooperation
Regardless of the administration, U.S.-Israel military and intelligence ties remain robust. Annual defense aid to Israel continues under Biden, including funding for the Iron Dome missile defense system.
However, Biden has signaled an openness to conditioning aid—a taboo under Trump. This subtle shift in tone suggests a willingness to leverage American support as a tool for accountability.
Meanwhile, intelligence sharing on regional threats, especially concerning Iran, Hezbollah, and Syria, remains a pillar of the relationship. The divergence is less about cooperation itself and more about how that cooperation aligns with broader diplomatic goals.
Human Rights and Global Perception
Under Biden, human rights have returned to the forefront of U.S. foreign policy narratives. The administration has spoken out against violence targeting civilians, both in Israel and the Palestinian territories, and has supported investigations into alleged abuses.
This stands in contrast to Trump’s tenure, which often prioritized strategic alliances over human rights concerns. Trump’s team largely ignored international criticism of Israeli policies, focusing instead on strengthening bilateral ties and sidelining multilateral diplomacy.
The Biden vs Trump Israel stance thus reveals a philosophical rift: one that pits values-driven diplomacy against transaction-based realism.
The Netanyahu Factor
Another crucial element in this equation is the personality and politics of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. He enjoyed a notably close relationship with Trump, often lavishing praise and aligning closely on geopolitical issues.
With Biden, the relationship is more formal and occasionally tense. The two leaders have known each other for decades, but their ideological differences—particularly regarding Iran and settlement expansion—have led to friction.
Netanyahu’s recent judicial reforms, which have sparked widespread protests in Israel, have drawn muted criticism from the Biden administration, reflecting the delicate nature of the alliance.
Normalization Efforts and the Future of Peace
Biden has continued to support the normalization process initiated by Trump through the Abraham Accords, while also attempting to re-integrate the Palestinian question into the broader conversation.
Efforts to bring Saudi Arabia into the normalization fold are underway, but with cautious diplomacy and less fanfare than Trump’s approach. Biden’s strategy aims for sustainability and inclusivity, rather than headline-grabbing deals.
The Biden vs Trump Israel stance here is a study in contrast: Trump opted for swift, bold moves to realign the region; Biden is favoring incremental, consensus-based diplomacy.
Domestic Political Implications
Israel remains a potent topic in American politics, influencing everything from campaign contributions to Congressional debates. Pro-Israel lobbying groups like AIPAC wield significant power, while progressive organizations such as J Street and IfNotNow are pushing for a reimagined U.S. role.
The 2024 election could once again thrust the Biden vs Trump Israel stance into the spotlight. Trump is likely to tout his record of unwavering support and landmark deals, while Biden will emphasize balance, diplomacy, and values-based engagement.
This divergence is not just policy—it’s political identity. Each leader’s approach to Israel reflects their broader worldview: Trump’s transactional nationalism versus Biden’s democratic idealism.
The U.S.-Israel alliance is not in question—its durability is unmatched in the annals of modern diplomacy. But how that alliance is defined, nurtured, and projected onto the world stage varies sharply depending on who is steering the American ship.
The Biden vs Trump Israel stance offers a revealing window into the values, priorities, and diplomatic styles of two very different leaders. Trump’s era was one of bold, disruptive gestures that redefined regional alignments. Biden’s tenure is marked by recalibration, an emphasis on balance, and a return to traditional diplomacy.
As global dynamics shift and regional tensions rise, the direction of U.S.-Israel relations will continue to serve as a barometer of America’s role in the Middle East. Whether voters in 2024 will favor Trump’s unabashed support or Biden’s measured stewardship remains to be seen. But one thing is certain: the future of this partnership will reverberate far beyond the ballots of November.
About the Author
